User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.17; Mac_PowerPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Internet Explorer 5.17Mac OS Classic pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.1Tasman MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.17closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.17Trident Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.17close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.17closeMac OS closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.17closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.17Trident Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.1.7Tasman Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.17closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:30 | by ThaDafinser