User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 2.3.5; vi; Q-Smart_S12) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.7.0.520 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 9.7.0.520Android 2.3.5 QMobileS12smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.7U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close IntexX2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.7 Android 2.3QMobileS12smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.118 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.7.0.520 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.7Gecko Android 2.3.5Q-MobileQ-Smart S12mobile:smartyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.08201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:30 | by ThaDafinser