User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10B500
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-369.php
Mobile Safari UIWebView 0.0iOS 6.1unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 6.1.6AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 6.1.6closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 6.1.6closeiOS 6.1.6AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.218 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 536.26iOS 6.1.6AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.536 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1.6AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.13401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:29 | by ThaDafinser