User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101031 Firefox-4.0/4.0b8pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 2.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.225 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 2.0bcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Beta 4.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox -4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox Gecko 20101031Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Gecko 2.0b8Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 77closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:28 | by ThaDafinser