User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 3.2.1; K1 Build/HTK75C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.63780
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoIdeapad K1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.63780closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.63780closeAndroid 3.2.1LenovoK1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Android 3.2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.63780closeAndroid 3.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 3.2.1LenovoIdeapad K1closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.17 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.63780WebKit 537.36Android 3.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.489 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Android 3.2.1LenovoIdeaPad K1tabletyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.63780closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2LenovoK1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.10901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:27 | by ThaDafinser