User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 SonyEricssonU1i/R1BB; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonU1i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0 SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonP100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Sony EricssonSatiofeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU1icloseclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U1icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Sony EricssonSatiomobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4SonyEricssonP100Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:27 | by ThaDafinser