User agent detail

LG-KG290UAE Obigo
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKG290UAE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-KG290UAE closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo close LGKG290UAEmobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKG290UAEsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGKG290UAEcloseclosecloseclose0.024 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGKG290UAEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo LGKG290UAEmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo close LGKG290UAEFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:27 | by ThaDafinser