User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Lenovo A880 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA880 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA880Mobile Phoneyesyes0.10301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA880smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA880closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.2.2LenovoA880mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA880Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:25 | by ThaDafinser