User agent detail

Mediapartners-Google
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAdSense BotBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Mediapartners-Google closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesMediapartners-Googleclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mediapartners-Google close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesMediapartners-GoogleCrawler2.47 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Google's Media Partners system (AdSense) closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.626 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Mediapartnersclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Mediapartnersclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:25 | by ThaDafinser