User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML; like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A523 Safari/8536.25 BingPreview/1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.178 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 6.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingPreview 1.0bWebKit 536.26iOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.13101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:25 | by ThaDafinser