User agent detail

Opera/9.50 (Nintendo DSi; Opera/507; U; ja)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
Opera 9.50 NintendoDSigaming:portableyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.50Presto 2.0 Desktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.50closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.177 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Nintendo Mobile DSiNintendoDSiconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50close NintendoDSicloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 507close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nintendo DSi Browser Presto NintendoNintendo DSicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.481 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.50 NintendoDSigaming:portableyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoDSiOther Mobileyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:25 | by ThaDafinser