User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx) AppleWebKit/525.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/525.1+) midori
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori Linux Webkit 525.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 525.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 525.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori WebKit 525.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori Webkit 525.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:25 | by ThaDafinser