User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; PMP7380D3G Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PrestigioPMP7380D3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.12001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.265 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.1PrestigioPMP7380D3Gtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.1.2PrestigioPMP7380D3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.182 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.1.2PrestigioMultipad 2 Pro Duo 8.0 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:24 | by ThaDafinser