User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.5; en-US; LG-P935 Build/GRJ90) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.8 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP935 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.8closeAndroid 2.3.5LGP935mobile-browseryescloseclose0.267 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 2.3LGP935smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.8closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 2.3.5LGP935closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.8WebKit 537.22Android 2.3.5LGLGP935closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.485 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 2.3.5LGOptimus LTEmobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.8closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 2.3LGP935Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:24 | by ThaDafinser