User agent detail

Glo-De-iPad/1.4.7 CFNetwork/672.0.2 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
iOS 7.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 7.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Glo-De-iPad 1.4.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 7.0AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 7.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.0.2closeiOS 7.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iOS AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iOS 7.0AppleiPadmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.16902 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:24 | by ThaDafinser