User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LG-E450 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile S
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE450 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.10701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.1.2LGE450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.1LGE450smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.2LGE450closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.2LGLGE450closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.2LGOptimus L5 IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 22closeAndroid 4.1LGE450Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.15201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:24 | by ThaDafinser