User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/602.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0 Safari/602.1 SUSE/20150920 (3.18.0) Epiphany/3.18.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
GNOME Web 3.18.0SUSE Webkit 602.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 8.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.18.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.18WebKit SUSE 20150920desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.18.0closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.18.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.18.0WebKit 602.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.18.0Webkit 602.1SUSE desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:24 | by ThaDafinser