User agent detail

3G Explorer/3.1.3.165 (Linux;Android 4.2.2,Lenovo K900) AppleWebKit/533.1 (860486024086613,00)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
3G Explorer 3.1.3Android 4.2.2Webkit 533.1LenovoK900mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
3G Explorer 3.1.3.165closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoK900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LenovoK900smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoK900)closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.423 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
3G Explorer 3.1.3Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2LenovoK900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:23 | by ThaDafinser