User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-CN; MI-ONEPlus) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.6.0.199 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
UC Browser 8.6.0.199Android 4.2.2WebKit XiaomiMI-ONEPlussmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.32703 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.199closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 4.2XiaomiMI-ONEPlussmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.199WebKit 534.13Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Webkit 534.13Android 4.2.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:23 | by ThaDafinser