User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (P01A;FOMA;like Gecko),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoP01A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close PanasonicP01Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoP01Acloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.501 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PanasonicP01Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo P01Acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoP-01AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:23 | by ThaDafinser