User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows CE 5.2; rv:1.8.1.4pre) Gecko/20070327 Minimo/0.020
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Minimo 0.020Windows CE 5.2Gecko 1.8.1mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.08401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Minimo 0.020closeWindows 5.2HTCTouchDualmobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Minimo closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Minimo 0.020closeWindows CE 5.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.4preGecko 20070327Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Minimo 0.020Gecko 1.8.1Windows CE 5.2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCTouchDualFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:22 | by ThaDafinser