User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/48.0.2548.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Chrome 48.0Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 48.0Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 48.0.2548.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 48.0.2548.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.212 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 48.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 48.0.2548.0closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 48.0.2548closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 48.0.2548.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 48.0.2548.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 48.0.2548.0Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 48.0.2548.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 48.0.2548.0closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:21 | by ThaDafinser