User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10A551
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-511.php
Mobile Safari UIWebView 0.0iOS 6.0unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.05401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 6.0.2AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 6.0.2closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 6.0.2closeiOS 6.0.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 536.26iOS 6.0.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.26iOS 6.0.2AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:21 | by ThaDafinser