User agent detail

LG-LG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456 UPBROWSER/6238 (GUI) MMP/20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGLG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGLG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGLG220CTF268435459300686055000000017725198456mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGLG220CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:21 | by ThaDafinser