User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-KS500/V08b Browser/Teleca-Q7.1/3.12 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKS500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGKS500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKS500smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGKS500closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
4.0 LGLGKS500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKS500mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-KS500closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGKS500Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:20 | by ThaDafinser