User agent detail

4D530A3D/2.1.1312.2401 (SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3540VX/3440VC/3440VX; Windows 8.1 (X86); de-DE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungELECTRONICS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
4D530A3D 2.1.1312.2401closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows SamsungELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 350V5Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8.1SamsungELECTRONICSsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows SamsungELECTRONICScloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.422 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows SamsungELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 350V5Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:19 | by ThaDafinser