User agent detail

jbed-fastbcc/UCWEB8.2.0.116/70/4171 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.2 Gecko mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
jbed-fastbcc UCWEB8.2.0.116closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.116close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.116 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:19 | by ThaDafinser