User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; LT28h Build/6.1.E.0.233) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobil
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonLT28h Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0SonyXperia ionsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4SonyEricssonLT28hcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.21 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4SonyXperia Ionmobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0SonyEricssonLT28iSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.14102 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:19 | by ThaDafinser