User agent detail

MOT-A-5C/00.01 UP.Browser/7.0.2.2.c.1.108 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/6.6.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA-5C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A-5C 00.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.2.c.1.108close Motorolai580mobile-browseryescloseclose0.208 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 MotorolaAsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.2close MotorolaA-5Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.2.c.1.108 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.0 MotorolaA-5Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorolai580Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:18 | by ThaDafinser