User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7) AppleWebKit/534.48.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.7 Safari/534.57.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 5.1.7OS X Lion 10.7Webkit 534.48.3desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.7closeOS X 10.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.7closeOS X 10.7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1.7closeMac OS X 10.7closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.7closeOS X 10.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.7WebKit 534.48.3Mac OS X 10.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1.7Webkit 534.48.3OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.1.3closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:17 | by ThaDafinser