User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux zvav; U; xx) Presto/2.12.423 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini Presto 2.12.423mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.227 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.10Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.10Presto 2.12.423Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.487 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini Presto 2.12.423 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:16 | by ThaDafinser