User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.452) Gecko/20041027 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.4Gecko 1.4WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.09201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.452closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.4closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.452closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.452Gecko 20041027Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.452Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:15 | by ThaDafinser