User agent detail

MOT-A668/ WAP.Browser/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA668 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 1.0 MotorolaA668Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A668 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close MotorolaA668mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaA668smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaA668closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MotorolaA668mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaA668Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:14 | by ThaDafinser