User agent detail

SAGEM-my411C-orange/1.0/ MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Browser/UP.Browser/7.2.6.c.1.382 (GUI)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.6 Sagemmy411C-orangefeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.08201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAGEM-my411C-orange 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.6.c.1.382close Sagemmy411Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Sagemmy411C-orangefeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.6close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.6.c.1.382 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.2 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Sagemmy411CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:13 | by ThaDafinser