User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; SBM302SH Build/S0014) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SharpSBM302SH Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2SharpAquos SBM302SHmobile-browseryescloseclose0.265 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.2Sharp302SHsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2SharpSBM302SHcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.2.2SharpAQUOS PHONE Xx 302SHmobile:smartyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.2SharpAquos SBM302SHSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:13 | by ThaDafinser