User agent detail

Mozilla/4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.34 i586)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Netscape 4.05Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.05Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.0.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.05closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.0.34closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.0.5 Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:10 | by ThaDafinser