User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Butterfly/1.0; +http://labs.topsy.com/butterfly/) Gecko/2009032608 Firefox/3.0.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesButterflyBot/Crawler0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesButterfly/1.0 aclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesButterfly RobotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.8close closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Topsy Butterfly Robot 1.0Gecko 2009032608 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesButterflyclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyestopsy Butterflyclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:09 | by ThaDafinser