User agent detail

DoCoMo/3.0/X503i/c10/serNMAIA000001
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-docomo.yaml
X503imobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoF1feature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
X503icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
X503imobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo X503icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:09 | by ThaDafinser