User agent detail

LG-C1500 UP.Browser/6.2.3 (GUI) MMP/1.0 (compatible;YahooSeeker/M1A1-R2D2; http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/crawling/crawling-01.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
YahooSeeker Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesYahooSeeker-MobileBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-C1500 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3close LGC1500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGC1500smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYahooSeekerclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3 LGLGC1500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.497 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesYahoo! Seekerclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGC1500Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:09 | by ThaDafinser