User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.63 Safari/535.7 CoolNovo/1.6.5.28
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
CoolNovo 1.6.5.28Windows 7WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 16.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
CoolNovo 1.6.5.28closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
CoolNovo 1.6WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.63closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 16.0.912closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 16.0.912.63closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
CoolNovo 1.6.5.28WebKit 535.7Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
CoolNovo 1.6.5Webkit 535.7Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:08 | by ThaDafinser