User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Primo Walpad 8W Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.122 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 35.0.1916.122Android 4.2.2Blink WaltonPrimo Walpad 8Wtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2WaltonPrimo Walpad 8Wtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2WaltonPrimo Walpad 8Wcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.398 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.2WaltonPrimo Walpad 8Wtabletyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.2WaltonPrimo Walpad 8WTabletyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:08 | by ThaDafinser