User agent detail

OPPOA617/2.07/11 Release/2011.6.14 Browser/Opera Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Opera Mobile mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Profilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
OPPOA617smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera MIDP-2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile mobile:featureyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:07 | by ThaDafinser