User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.centos.plus.i686 i686) KHTML/4.10.2 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.10 Fedora/4.10.2-1.el6.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.10Fedora KHTML 4.10.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.35304 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.10KHTML CentOS desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.10closeFedora 4.10.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.132 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.10 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10.2Fedora desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:06 | by ThaDafinser