User agent detail

Opera/9.30 (Nintendo Wii; U; ; 3642; ja)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
Opera 9.30 NintendoWiigaming:console Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.30Presto 2.0 NintendoWiiConsoleyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.30closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.177 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.30Presto Nintendo WiiNintendoWiiconsoleyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.30close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.30close NintendoWiicloseclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.30close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Channel Presto NintendoNintendo Wiicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.30 NintendoWiigaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.30closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWiiSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:06 | by ThaDafinser