User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U ; Android 2.2. 1 ; en-us ; SCH-R910 Build / FROYO)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-R910 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2.SamsungGalaxy Indulge 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungSCH-R910smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.2.closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2SamsungSCH-R910closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.2SamsungGalaxy Indulge 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.11201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:06 | by ThaDafinser