User agent detail

Proxy Gear Pro/2.1 (Windows; N; Windows NT 6.1; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-350.php
yesProxy Gear ProBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesProxy Gear ProBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Proxy closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:05 | by ThaDafinser