User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Archos 97 Cobalt Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos97 Cobalt Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.241 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.1Archos97 Cobalttabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.1.1Archos97 Cobaltcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.1.1Archos97 Cobalttabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.1Archos97 CobaltTabletyesyescloseclose0.07401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:04 | by ThaDafinser