User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Mac_PowerPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 4.01Mac Trident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 4.01Tasman MacPPC Windows DesktopDesktop0.06901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 4.01Trident Mac desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.1closeMac OS closeclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 4.1Trident Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 4.0.1Tasman Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 4.01closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:03 | by ThaDafinser