User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android2.3.5;Zh_cn;Micromax A35;480*800;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
UC Browser 7.8Android 2.3unknown MicromaxA35Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android 2.3MicromaxA35Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.286 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android MicroMaxA35smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 2.3.5MicromaxA35 Boltmobile:smartyescloseclose0.109 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:03 | by ThaDafinser