User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.20/24.1084; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 800X480 LG VX1100000d
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVX1100000d Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.2Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.20close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.20Presto Brew LGVX1100000dsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.20close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.20closeBREW LGVX1100000dcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.20close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.20Presto 2.5.25a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.20Presto 2.5.25Brew LGVX1100000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:03 | by ThaDafinser